Thank you.
Thank you for Winona Ryder.
Thank you for the synth score.
Thank you for Peter Gabriel's cover of "Heroes."
Thank you for the best '80s period piece since House of the Devil.
Thank you for being essential Christmas viewing.
Thank you for being consistently enjoyable.
Thank you.
Love,
This Guy
Letters from This Guy
Wednesday, August 3, 2016
Tuesday, February 18, 2014
Dear Kimberly Peirce,
As expected, your Carrie (2013) is more female-centric than Brian
De Palma's Carrie (1976); however, yours is vastly inferior. Remember
how De Palma opens his film with an amazing slow-motion, tracking
shot through an ethereal, steam-filled locker room? Remember how the
wonder of that scene continues to build until the water running down
Carrie's leg turns to blood? Remember how, at that point, all that
was ethereal and wondrous breaks into terrestrial discord and terror?
It is pretty amazing. Remember how you open your film with Julianne
Moore playing a very unconvincing and uninteresting mother
unexpectedly giving birth and then almost murdering the baby?
Remember how even that threat of death is unconvincing and
uninteresting? Remember how that scene feels like it only exists to
introduce scissors as a potential weapon and to hint at Carrie's
future telekinesis? Remember how that feeling is confirmed at the end
when Carrie is telekinetic and does kill her mother with scissors?
Foreshadowing can be an effective narrative device, but it is not so
in your film. Similarly, remember how your shower-menstruation scene
is also unconvincing and uninteresting? Remember how it is used
merely to establish a shot from Carrie's POV looking at her bloody
hands, so you can then reuse that shot in the prom scene? Again, a
failed attempt at something interesting. Remember how the best
performance in your movie is from Hart Bochner (which would be even
better if he told his daughter, "Chris, boubbie . . . I'm your
white knight")? Isn't it kind of disappointing that the best
performance in your female-centric film comes from a man who isn't
even credited?
The most interesting thing to come from your film, though, was that it took me to the Internet to find out exactly how to spell "boubbie." Interestingly, Hart Bochner's line in the Die Hard screenplay is scripted, "Hans, baby . . . I'm your white knight." However, instead of saying the word "baby," in the film Bochner actually uses the term "boubbie" (pronounced bo͝o' bee, with a short o͝o, in which the "ou" is pronounced like the "oo" in "book"). Being a derivative of the affectionate term "bubbellah," "boubbie" is of Yiddish origin and is used between close friends and long-term business partners (see this online Yiddish dictionary). Of course, Bochner's character Harry Ellis calls Hans "boubbie" in his attempt to gain favor with him. An Internet search for the line produces many other spellings including "boubie," "bubby," "bubbey," "bubbie," "booby," "boobey," "boobie," "buhbie," and even "bubi." "Boubie" is close yet misspelled. "Bubby" (buh' bee), firstly, is a Yiddish term for grandmother. Secondly, according to the ever-suspect and nonauthoritative urbandictionary.com, "bubby" and its variant spellings "bubbey," and "bubbie" can also refer to a close loved one, such as a significant other, a child, or a brother. "Booby" (bo͞o' bee, with a long o͞o, in which the "oo" is pronounced like the "u" in "tube") can mean a foolish or stupid person, a mistake, a large tropical seabird with brightly colored feet, or, of course, a female breast. Some contend that "booby," "boobey," and "boobie" are alternate spellings for the second definition of "bubby" referring to a loved one. Interestingly, a "Boobie" could also refer to a hamburger (or perhaps as an identifier for any comestible) from the now-defunct restaurant Boobie's Burgers of Boise, Idaho. However, the latest information reports that Boobie's, which was named after the owner's dog, has been closed since April 2011. The restaurant's website and phone number are no longer operative, and its Facebook page is boring (even more boring than your movie). Finally, both "buhbie" and "bubi" are considered by some to also be alternate spellings for the second definition of "bubby." Anyway, that's the long way to say that Hart Bochner is awesome when he says, "Hans, boubbie . . . I'm your white knight."
Honestly, Chloƫ Grace Moretz is no Sissy Spacek. Julianne Moore is no Piper Laurie. And do I even need to mention John Travolta and Nancy Allen? No, I don't. Are you talentless? No. Could Brian De Palma make Boys Don't Cry? No. Was your Carrie an attempt to emphasize different aspects of the story? Yes. Was it good? No. And one last comment: when I watch a Carrie movie, I should not have to endure CGI blood. Lame.
Sincerely,
This Guy
![]() |
| Shower-menstruation |
The most interesting thing to come from your film, though, was that it took me to the Internet to find out exactly how to spell "boubbie." Interestingly, Hart Bochner's line in the Die Hard screenplay is scripted, "Hans, baby . . . I'm your white knight." However, instead of saying the word "baby," in the film Bochner actually uses the term "boubbie" (pronounced bo͝o' bee, with a short o͝o, in which the "ou" is pronounced like the "oo" in "book"). Being a derivative of the affectionate term "bubbellah," "boubbie" is of Yiddish origin and is used between close friends and long-term business partners (see this online Yiddish dictionary). Of course, Bochner's character Harry Ellis calls Hans "boubbie" in his attempt to gain favor with him. An Internet search for the line produces many other spellings including "boubie," "bubby," "bubbey," "bubbie," "booby," "boobey," "boobie," "buhbie," and even "bubi." "Boubie" is close yet misspelled. "Bubby" (buh' bee), firstly, is a Yiddish term for grandmother. Secondly, according to the ever-suspect and nonauthoritative urbandictionary.com, "bubby" and its variant spellings "bubbey," and "bubbie" can also refer to a close loved one, such as a significant other, a child, or a brother. "Booby" (bo͞o' bee, with a long o͞o, in which the "oo" is pronounced like the "u" in "tube") can mean a foolish or stupid person, a mistake, a large tropical seabird with brightly colored feet, or, of course, a female breast. Some contend that "booby," "boobey," and "boobie" are alternate spellings for the second definition of "bubby" referring to a loved one. Interestingly, a "Boobie" could also refer to a hamburger (or perhaps as an identifier for any comestible) from the now-defunct restaurant Boobie's Burgers of Boise, Idaho. However, the latest information reports that Boobie's, which was named after the owner's dog, has been closed since April 2011. The restaurant's website and phone number are no longer operative, and its Facebook page is boring (even more boring than your movie). Finally, both "buhbie" and "bubi" are considered by some to also be alternate spellings for the second definition of "bubby." Anyway, that's the long way to say that Hart Bochner is awesome when he says, "Hans, boubbie . . . I'm your white knight."
![]() |
| "Hans, boubbie . . . I'm your white knight." |
Honestly, Chloƫ Grace Moretz is no Sissy Spacek. Julianne Moore is no Piper Laurie. And do I even need to mention John Travolta and Nancy Allen? No, I don't. Are you talentless? No. Could Brian De Palma make Boys Don't Cry? No. Was your Carrie an attempt to emphasize different aspects of the story? Yes. Was it good? No. And one last comment: when I watch a Carrie movie, I should not have to endure CGI blood. Lame.
Sincerely,
This Guy
Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Dear Ridley Scott,
Remember how in Alien the alien spaceship looks otherworldly and awesome? Remember how in Prometheus the alien spaceship looks like a curled-up turd?
Sincerely,
This Guy
Sincerely,
This Guy
Saturday, September 29, 2012
Dear George Lucas,
Remember how you were interviewed about Willow in 1988? You said, “Special effects never make a movie.
I don't make special effects movies. I make movies about people, and
in order to tell the story I have to use special effects in order to
create the environments.” You actually kind of sound sincere, which might have been true in 1988, but now it sounds like a joke.
In case you haven't seen it yet, check this:
Also, you should read this letter that I wrote.
When I think about you, I am reminded of the first part of Jesus' parable of the prodigal son. Remember how he took his inheritance and squandered it with riotous living? Well, here is how I see it as an analogy for you: your "inheritance" is THX 1138, Star Wars, The Empire Strikes Back, and Return of the Jedi; "squandering" means ruining (perhaps, even perverting); and "riotous living" is CGI effects. Thus, my Bible now reads thus, "And George Lucas took his masterworks THX 1138 and the Star Wars trilogy and ruined (perverted) them with CGI effects." I'd like to think that I'm a guy of faith, so I hope I still have a modicum of faith that you will "come to" yourself, like the prodigal son, repent of your transgressions, and return to your fans. Although most fans I know are already in line to spit on your grave, I hope we will be humble enough at that day to welcome you home and kill the fatted calf for you. If you ever do repent and return, I imagine Sebastian Shaw will be at the feast, not Hayden Christensen.
Sincerely,
This Guy
Dear parents of children,
The other day, on a popular social networking site, a friend posited a question about the appropriate time to introduce children to Star Wars. His post also linked to this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCjMGOvMghY
His question was completely serious, and I gave a completely serious answer. Here is my answer for you to read and ponder:
"I think, perhaps, there may not be a minimum age at which to introduce your children to Star Wars (which of course means Star Wars (1977) because one should only refer to Star Wars (1977) as "Star Wars"--it's original theatrical title). However, this should be the only Star Wars film that they should know in their formative years. This also means that you should only show them the original theatrical cut. When they are old enough to understand the importance of Akira Kurosawa's influence on Lucas and Star Wars, then it may be appropriate to introduce them to The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi (again, the original theatrical versions). They may get mad at you for holding out on them, but it is for their benefit. After all, milk before meat, line upon line, precept upon precept, and so on, right? It is also your responsibility to teach them of the dangers and consequences of watching the special editions and prequels. Despite your teaching, they may experiment with the special editions and prequels when they are adolescents, and if so, they need to know that, even though you disapprove of their behavior, you will always love them and that they can always repent. They live in a time when there are many who will tempt them and seek to beguile them with special editions and prequels, but it is important to teach your children how to guard and protect themselves against such deceivers, including Lucas himself. They need to be taught how to be in the world but not of the world."
You're welcome.
Sincerely,
This Guy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCjMGOvMghY
His question was completely serious, and I gave a completely serious answer. Here is my answer for you to read and ponder:
"I think, perhaps, there may not be a minimum age at which to introduce your children to Star Wars (which of course means Star Wars (1977) because one should only refer to Star Wars (1977) as "Star Wars"--it's original theatrical title). However, this should be the only Star Wars film that they should know in their formative years. This also means that you should only show them the original theatrical cut. When they are old enough to understand the importance of Akira Kurosawa's influence on Lucas and Star Wars, then it may be appropriate to introduce them to The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi (again, the original theatrical versions). They may get mad at you for holding out on them, but it is for their benefit. After all, milk before meat, line upon line, precept upon precept, and so on, right? It is also your responsibility to teach them of the dangers and consequences of watching the special editions and prequels. Despite your teaching, they may experiment with the special editions and prequels when they are adolescents, and if so, they need to know that, even though you disapprove of their behavior, you will always love them and that they can always repent. They live in a time when there are many who will tempt them and seek to beguile them with special editions and prequels, but it is important to teach your children how to guard and protect themselves against such deceivers, including Lucas himself. They need to be taught how to be in the world but not of the world."
You're welcome.
Sincerely,
This Guy
Saturday, September 8, 2012
Dear Bobcat Goldthwait,
Thank you for God Bless America.
More particularly, thank you for casting Joel Murray as Frank. Joel is greatly underappreciated and proves his talent with this gem of a performance.
Sincerely,
This Guy
More particularly, thank you for casting Joel Murray as Frank. Joel is greatly underappreciated and proves his talent with this gem of a performance.
Sincerely,
This Guy
Sunday, June 3, 2012
Dear DC Comics,
You should introduce a Green Lantern who wears drag. Call him "Queen Lantern."
Sincerely,
This Guy
Sincerely,
This Guy
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)


